OpenAI Codex App: The response to Claude Code's $1B success
OpenAI launches Codex App to compete with Anthropic's Claude Code. We compare features, pricing, and use cases of the two most powerful AI coding tools of 2026.
OpenAI officially launched Codex App, their direct response to Claude Code’s massive success. With one million monthly active developers since its December launch, OpenAI aims to regain ground in the AI coding market that Anthropic dominates.
The context: Claude Code’s success
Claude Code became a phenomenon in 2025:
| Metric | Claude Code |
|---|---|
| Annualized revenue | $1 billion |
| Time to $1B | 6 months |
| Enterprise users | Thousands of companies |
| Main use | Full-stack development |
For context, ChatGPT took 2 years to reach that figure.
OpenAI Codex App: Main features
Multiple simultaneous agents
The star feature: managing multiple AI agents in parallel for long projects:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CODEX APP - MULTI-AGENT │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Project: E-commerce Migration │
│ │
│ Agent 1 (Backend) Agent 2 (Frontend) Agent 3 │
│ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Migrating APIs │ │ Updating React │ │ Writing │ │
│ │ from REST to │ │ components │ │ E2E tests │ │
│ │ GraphQL │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ [████████░░] │ │ [██████░░░░] │ │ [████░░░░░]│ │
│ │ 80% │ │ 60% │ │ 40% │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ Total: 3 active agents | Estimated time: 2h 15m │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Persistent project context
Unlike traditional chat, Codex App:
- Maintains complete project context
- Remembers architectural decisions
- Understands dependencies between files
- Tracks changes and can revert
OpenAI ecosystem integration
| Feature | Availability |
|---|---|
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Generation backend |
| ChatGPT Plus | Integrated |
| API access | Available |
| GitHub Copilot | Complementary |
Comparison: Codex App vs Claude Code
Features
| Feature | Codex App | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent | Yes, native | Limited |
| CLI | Desktop app | CLI + Desktop |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 200K tokens |
| Autonomous mode | Yes | Yes (excellent) |
| Git integration | Yes | Yes |
| Refactoring | Good | Excellent |
| Debugging | Very good | Excellent |
Pricing (estimated)
| Plan | Codex App | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 50 requests/day | 20 requests/day |
| Pro | $25/month | $20/month |
| Team | $30/user/month | $25/user/month |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
Languages and frameworks
Both support major ones, but with differences:
Codex App better at:
- Python (ML/AI)
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- Azure integration
Claude Code better at:
- Multi-language projects
- Large codebases (200K+ lines)
- Complex refactoring
Use cases: When to use each
Use Codex App if:
- Working with multiple parallel tasks - Multi-agent system is superior
- Your stack is mainly Python/JS - Better optimized
- Already using OpenAI/Azure - Native integration
- Want graphical UI - Desktop app is polished
Use Claude Code if:
- Very large codebases - Better context window
- Need deep refactoring - Superior in structural changes
- Legacy projects - Better understanding of old code
- Prefer CLI - Smoother experience
Recommended hybrid workflow
In our practice, we use both:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HYBRID WORKFLOW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. Planning and architecture │
│ → Claude Code (better reasoning) │
│ │
│ 2. Parallel feature development │
│ → Codex App (multi-agent) │
│ │
│ 3. Refactoring and cleanup │
│ → Claude Code (more precise) │
│ │
│ 4. Testing and debugging │
│ → Both work well │
│ │
│ 5. Documentation │
│ → ChatGPT/Claude (not coding tools) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The AI Coding market in 2026
| Tool | Estimated users | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | 15M+ | Inline completions |
| Claude Code | 5M+ | Autonomous development |
| Cursor | 3M+ | IDE integration |
| Codex App | 1M+ (growing) | Multi-agent |
| Devin | 100K+ | Full autonomy |
What’s next
Q1 2026
- Codex App: Multi-agent improvements
- Claude Code: Claude Sonnet 5 integration
- GitHub Copilot: Workspace improvements
Q2 2026
- Market consolidation
- Possible acquisitions
- More competitive pricing
Conclusion
Competition between OpenAI and Anthropic in AI coding is excellent for developers:
- Better tools
- More competitive pricing
- More innovation
We recommend trying both tools and choosing based on your workflow. Most teams will end up using both for different tasks.
Need help implementing AI in your development workflow? Contact us for a free consultation on AI coding tools.
Have a project in mind?
Let's talk about how we can help you achieve your technology goals.
Schedule a free consultation